As I see China problem is overaccumulation of capital, lots of investments with negative
rate of return if prices were right, which are artificially profitable due to
huge distortions. As prices get corrected, productivity will reflect its true
value, and output will drop. Thing is, that usually this process shows up as non-performing-loans
in the financial sector. And as such, the way Government deals with financial
sector rupture defines the shape of the economic crisis. That’s why I’m
thinking how the forthcoming crisis will be.
1) A la Lehman. If the political system
is such that bailing out banks looks bad, Government may let some big bank
fail. Financial intermediation stops, lights are turned off, the economy
collapses. One year of deep recession. Plus two additional years of healing.
But I doubt this would happen in China.
2) Gangnam style. Like in Korea, Government bails out big time,
quickly cleans up all banks balance sheets, finding buyers for the banks it
shut down. Recession lasts for only one year, and the economy rapidly resumes
growth
3) Lost Decade. Like Japan, China opts
for a slow healing. They are proud of their millennium culture and fond of
very slow changes, after all. Slowly reduce credit growth. Many years to clean
up banks. A decade of slow growth.
I can't decide between 2 and 3. Celso, why do ya think?
I guess they would choose 2 comparing what happened after the crisis both in Korea and Japan. They could even say that they learned with Japan's mistakes.
ReplyDelete